A lot is being said on both sides of the gun control issue right now but not a lot of substance actually coming out. The NRA and other "Gun religions" are creating a straw man to try and argue their case. They paint the gun control advocates as people who all believe noone has a right to own a gun or should only own limited guns. They want their followers to believe gun control only means taking away their guns. While there are many who do believe in that kind of gun control the majority actually just want to find ways to limit the availability of guns to the wrong people. And when a gun falls in to the wrong hands someone should answer as to how this happened. I find it preposterous to think that our forefathers would say we should be allowed to have easy access to any type of gun manufactured, they could never fathom the destruction that can be caused by todays weapons plus the other problem with that argument is they never intended for the second amendment to apply to everyone it does today. In the days this nation was founded you pretty much had to be a white landowner to have rights(oh and a male). ( And don't go quoting the second amendment I know how it reads and this is a very different world than the one that existed when it was written) Now I am not saying we should not be able to have any type of gun manufactured I just believe there should be numerous controls as to how you obtain them and should be properly trained to use them. I have seen the recent arguments as to how the teachers in Israel carry guns to protect their students. Really? You really want that to be one of your arguments. You want to be like Israel? That is a war torn country how do you not understand that? Thr pro gun postings on facebook do not paint a very good picture of who gun right advocates are either. Most gun rights people I know tend to have faith in God but then they post items like cartoons that say "Please rob my neighbor he believes in gun control" Or "this house protected by guns and God, enter unlawfully and you will meet both" . These are not funny, just hateful of people who do not agree with you.
On the other side of the issue the gun control activists seem to believe that more gun control would solve the issues we have seen more and more often with these mass killings. It seems like quite a stretch as these are demented people who were going to find a way to commit these heinous acts no matter what. Might there have been less damage if we could find a way to deter their access to guns, maybe. But the gun rights advocate have a great point in that people kill people the gun is just a tool. Admittedly a gun has only one real use and all other uses are still based on that one use and that is to kill, but for protection shouldn't you be able to have an assault rifle to protect yourself from one who might break in and also have an assault rifle. They are already out there so people may have a right to be prepared for such an issue. The police can't protect you once you are already in that situation they tend to be more of a cleanup crew. Gun control advocates also need to recognize many people own guns for many different reasons, collectors, hunters, protection reasons, just because they can, and most do not own any that could cause the mass destruction we have been seeing lately. Not all NRA members oppose gun registration or mandatory training classes. We tend to hear mostly from extremists.
I understand the debate from both sides but I find it would be better served without all the false rhetoric and outright lies. I believe most politicians if they were to be honest without fear of losing a large portion of their constituency would say Americans should be able to own most any gun they want but would also tell you there should definitely be some controls put in place to keep them out of the wrong hands. What defines the "wrong hands" would be a whole other debate. I know of many people who qualify to carry and that definitely doesn't make me feel safer knowing that if ya get my drift. No I will not mention names.